The culture per era is much more interesting than choosing one culture in the very beginning and keeping it. in the civilization series where this is just a number next to the city name. The way cities grow through districts is much more enjoyable and also the fortifications are much more omnipresent than e.g. The stability system is nice in theory, but practically requires more balance in upcoming patches.
I like this system very much as it is more gradual and the choices are clear. There are some things absent, that are very much present in Civ such as the form of government (monarchy, feudalism), but it is i replaced with a set of civic choices and a 4-dimensional ideology system that provides various bonuses. The end game can be interesting I suppose if you don't give up on a bad early start and try to recover even from lost wars. Especially, the addition of the neolithic era is a great addition to this genre that otherwise always starts with putting the first city down exactly where the map generation algorithms have put you. Snowballing is a problem, however, the early game provides a lot of challenges and is very fun to play. The only problem with the game is that it isn't as balanced when it was released. I also like the way trade and diplomacy works. It's a good mix between 1upt and stack of doom. Sieges work in a way that are much distinct from Civilization and combat in general is very refreshing. But also peaceful expansion is possible focusing on wonders, and empire growth. Combat and military conquest is among the best. The game has a very unique and awesome look and feel. Anyway, talking about Humankind: The music is awesome, the artwork is so nice. The best 4X game that I have played so far (I started playing Civ1 on a Macintosh probably around 1993 and have played every Civilization The best 4X game that I have played so far (I started playing Civ1 on a Macintosh probably around 1993 and have played every Civilization title since then).
0 kommentar(er)
